Post Reply
- Print view
7 posts• Page 1 of 1
silente
- silente
- 6
- Joined: 27 Nov 2010, 15:04
- Contact:
Contact silente
Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
I write this post to ask your opinion about the ideal relationship between track width and wheelbase dimensions.
A long wheelbase car should have more stability during brakings and, if it's polar inertia is not so high, should produce more yaw moment in corner entry. On the other hand, in slow corners it should have a more "understeering tendency" asking for more steering angle and it should be less agile.
A wide track will produce less weigth transfer and so should give an higher cornering grip potential, but the car will tend to follow wider lines on the track and to have, for example, a bigger frontal area.
I read a lot of things on the relationship between these two parameters but i would like to read your ideas about which is, in your opinion, the best way to choose track width once you fixed wheelbase.
The wider is better? Or there are other things i am missing which could lead to choose a smaller track width if your wheelbase is not so big?
Last edited by silente on 27 Mar 2011, 14:51, edited 1 time in total.
Top
- mep
- 29
- Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
- Location: Germany
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
silente wrote:I read a lot of things on the relationship between this two parameters but i would like to read your ideas about which is, in your opinion, the best way to choose track width once you fixed wheelbase.
What are you reading?
Top
silente
- silente
- 6
- Joined: 27 Nov 2010, 15:04
- Contact:
Contact silente
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
For example there were some article on racecar engineering about one year ago of a man trying to build an hillclimb car.
It was claiming to use the so called "golden ratio" (which is around 1.7 i think) between wheelbase a track. But my question is why that ratio?
What i would like to discuss is what are the pros and cons of having a wider track also if your wheelbase is not so long.
Top
mx_tifoso
- mx_tifoso
- 0
- Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Contact mx_tifoso
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
I suggest taking a stroll through the threads in the "Similar Topics" list at the bottom of this page.
(Or doing a search the next time around.)
Welcome to F1T Silente, if you haven't been welcomed before.
Forum guide: read before posting
"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.
Top
- mep
- 29
- Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
- Location: Germany
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
silente wrote:It was claiming to use the so called "golden ratio" (which is around 1.7 i think) between wheelbase a track. But my question is why that ratio?
Isn't that golden ratio/cut just some optical thing which looks pleasant to your eye?
There is no physical reason behind that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
What you have not mentioned yet is increased load transfer for a shorter car.
Let's say you have a rearward biased CoG. During acceleration load will shift to the rear wheels -> better acceleration.
During braking load will shift towards a more neutral position giving you better braking.,
Top
RH1300S
- RH1300S
- 1
- Joined: 06 Jun 2005, 15:29
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
silente wrote:For example there were some article on racecar engineering about one year ago of a man trying to build an hillclimb car.
It was claiming to use the so called "golden ratio" (which is around 1.7 i think) between wheelbase a track. But my question is why that ratio?
What i would like to discuss is what are the pros and cons of having a wider track also if your wheelbase is not so long.
The golden ratio is about 1.618 (or 0.618) - it would be fascinating to think that it applies to cars as well as other areas in life.
Perhaps someone should build a car with that ratio and let us know....
BTW - My beloved Alpine A110 has a wheelbase of 2100mm, rear track is 1290mm - damned near perfect!!! Perhaps it's true
Top
- 747heavy
- 24
- Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45
Re: Track width vs Wheelbase
- Quote
Post
I think you would need to consider, what the intented purpose for your car (vehicle) is.
And perhaps the regulations which apply for this type/class of racing.
To give a rather extreme example: Top Fuel dragster vs. Kart
just some random thougths:
- car width (an thereby track width) is limited by the rules in most categories
- most categories demand that the drivers feet are behind the front axle line, so with some other given factors (engine length etc.) you will arrive at a minimum wheelbase fo pactical purpose
- a wider car, increases in most cases the frontal area (more drag), depending on your overall circuit characteristic (LeMans, Monza vs. Monaco etc.) this can have negative effects on your overall performance.
- you would need to consider things like minimum corner radius on the tracks you run (think Loewes hair pin in Monaco) and average speed etc. before you decide on a specific ratio - IMHO
So there is a difference designing a car to race on a varity of known tracks ( let´s say FIA GT championship) and a car for an FSAE autocross test (one specific event/track).
for the race cars I have seen/worked on ratio´s between 1.4-1.7 seem to be quite common. (but in most cases (in my field) regulatory constrains play a role)
Karts are close(r) to 1 while dragsters are the other extreme with a ratio of 2+
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver." - Colin Chapman
“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci
Top
Post Reply
- Print view
7 posts• Page 1 of 1
Return to “Other racing series”
Jump to
- Formula One
- ↳ General chat
- ↳ Formula One races
- ↳ Formula One teams
- ↳ Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres
- ↳ Engine, transmission and controls
- Automotive
- ↳ Other racing series
- ↳ Automotive news and technology
- ↳ Engineering projects
- General
- ↳ Off topic chat